tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3795139595326363530.post2451308397069226..comments2024-03-08T00:14:59.959-08:00Comments on By the Rules: Hunting and Trapping in Fleet Racing -- Q&A 2013 034Rob Overtonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15930035790398220437noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3795139595326363530.post-30828947043498311012020-06-15T00:16:44.377-07:002020-06-15T00:16:44.377-07:00This are new articles style for you. แทงบาคาร่า Y...<br />This are new articles style for you. <a href="https://our-mrs-saku-love.tumblr.com/post/620969207980589056/%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%8B%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A3-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%97-%E0%B8%A3-%E0%B8%99-%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%81-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9B-%E0%B8%94%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A5-%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%AD-%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%9E-%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%82%E0%B8%A1-%E0%B8%99-2-1" rel="nofollow">แทงบาคาร่า</a> You can find some new idea on this. <a href="https://sakukrub.blogspot.com/2020/06/2-1.html" rel="nofollow">แทงบาคาร่า</a> It might help you to write or think some new idea.<br /><a href="https://sakukrub1.wixsite.com/mysite/post/%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%8B%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%95-%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9F-%E0%B8%A3-%E0%B8%A1-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%8B-%E0%B8%8B-%E0%B8%A7%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%8B-%E0%B8%95-%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%88%E0%B8%A3-%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%95-%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A7%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A2-%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A7%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%84-%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%99" rel="nofollow">แทงบาคาร่า</a> Thanks for sharing such a wonderful post.<br /><a href="https://saku16.cabanova.com/1.html" rel="nofollow">แทงบาคาร่า</a> I am very glad for reading my articles.UFA888https://www.blogger.com/profile/02148735920354450465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3795139595326363530.post-32175035033718150432020-04-06T02:12:58.021-07:002020-04-06T02:12:58.021-07:00Fantastic post! You are sharing amazing informatio...Fantastic post! You are sharing amazing information through your blog. I am a big fan of your excellent your writing skills. <a href="https://timviec.com.vn/marketing-pr" rel="nofollow">xem them</a> .Hoàng Quyênhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08332751330361875996noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3795139595326363530.post-53487564889647786102019-05-26T11:50:45.761-07:002019-05-26T11:50:45.761-07:00Excellent website! I adore how it is easy on my ey...Excellent website! I adore how it is easy on my eyes it is. I am questioning how I might be notified whenever a new post has been made. Looking for more new updates. Have a great day! <a href="https://archerytopic.com/best-elk-hunting-pack/" rel="nofollow">https://archerytopic.com/best-elk-hunting-pack/</a><br />DFC SEOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09891017095423817308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3795139595326363530.post-80389587598958273132014-08-13T15:59:58.955-07:002014-08-13T15:59:58.955-07:00I think that ISAF Cases 60 and 88 speak to this is...I think that ISAF Cases 60 and 88 speak to this issue. Case 60 is similar (in all important aspects) to Situation 2 in the Q&A. It concludes, however, that the starboard tack boat breaks rule 16.1. That directly contradicts the conclusion of Q&A 034. Case 88 does not speak to rules 15 or 16, but it does state "a boat may avoid contact and yet fail to keep clear", which is also contrary to the Q&A opinion. As the ISAF Cases are "authoritative interpretations" and the Q&A's are not, I have to agree that the Q&A panel got 034 wrong.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14303851851589598762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3795139595326363530.post-74739677064254490812013-11-12T16:11:07.326-08:002013-11-12T16:11:07.326-08:00I think in each case the right of way boat breaks ...I think in each case the right of way boat breaks rule 15 or 16, based on the descriptions (which I'm treating as "facts found"). For example, in situation 1 the description says "A tacks onto starboard tack so close to B on port tack that A cannot sail straight ahead without hitting B, and B cannot avoid a collision by maneuvering promptly in a seamanlike way." So initially A does not give B room to keep clear and therefore A breaks rule 15. Each of the descriptions has similar wording to indicate A's breach of either rule 15 or 16. So in none of the cases should we disqualify B.Rob Overtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15930035790398220437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3795139595326363530.post-24922484414446274342013-11-06T11:30:13.111-08:002013-11-06T11:30:13.111-08:00Rob,
Thanks very much for this posting. This Q&a...Rob,<br /><br />Thanks very much for this posting. This Q&A has had me scratching my head since it was release a month ago. This is not what we're teaching judges in the US. It seems to me that we can argue about whether the ROW boat breaks 15 or 16 in these situation, but we can't dispute the fact the the give-way boat breaks a rule of Part A in all four situations. If we start with that thesis, rule 64.1 requires us to DSQ the give-way boat unless she is exonerated. There seems to be no justification in dismissing both protests.John Siegelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02438601601066755043noreply@blogger.com